세계에너지시장정보 통합검색
정책동향보고서
| 제목 | 미국) 발전기 상호 연결 스코어카드: 미국 7개 지역 송전 시스템 운영업체의 상호 연결 결과 및 프로세스 순위 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 국가 | [미국] | 출처 | Advanced Energy United |
| 산업구분 | [스마트그리드] | 등록일 | 2024.03.07 |
이 보고서는 1) 상호 연결 프로세스 결과, 2) 대기열 사전 정보, 3) 상호 연결 프로세스 설계, 4) 가정, 기준 및 재현 가능성, 5) 상호 연결 대안의 가용성, 6) 지역 전송 계획의 6가지 차원에서 각 지역의 상호 연결 프로세스를 측정한 보고서이다. 원문 제목 및 목차
제목 :
Generator Interconnection Scorecard: Ranking Interconnection Outcomes and Processes of the Seven U.S. Regional Transmission System Operators 원문목차 :
Executive Summary ................. 5 1 The Purpose of the Generator Interconnection Scorecard ................. 9 2 The Generator Interconnection Process .............. 10 3 Approach to Developing the Scorecard .............. 15 3.1. Scorecard Categories and Metrics .............. 15 3.2. Evidence Relied on for Scoring Interconnection Processes .............. 16 4 Generator Interconnection Scorecard Results .............. 18 5 Scorecard Detailed Results and Discussion .............. 21 5.1. Interconnection Process Results .............. 21 5.1.1. Speed: Length and predictability of study and network upgrade process .............. 22 5.1.2. Regional assessments of interconnection speed .............. 26 5.1.3. Interconnection Costs: Cost uncertainty a larger concern than total costs .............. 31 5.1.4. Regional assessments of interconnection costs .............. 35 5.2. Pre-Queue Information .............. 38 5.3. Interconnection Study Process .............. 42 5.3.1. Staff resources are inadequate in every respect .............. 43 5.3.2. Transparency depends on individual staffers .............. 44 5.3.3. Supply chain and other construction bottlenecks .............. 44 5.3.4. Regional assessments of interconnection study process .............. 45 5.4. Interconnection Study Assumptions, Criteria, & Replicability .............. 52 5.4.1. Affected system studies .............. 53 5.4.2. Modeling criteria and assumptions .............. 54 5.4.3. Evaluation of options to accelerate upgrades .............. 54 5.4.4. Regional assessments of interconnection study assumptions, criteria and replicability .............. 54 5.5. Availability of Attractive Interconnection Alternatives .............. 57 5.5.1. ERIS vs NRIS: ERIS is little used, and impacts incumbent generators .............. 58 5.5.2. Other interconnection alternatives: Meaningful in CAISO and a few other systems .............. 60 5.5.3. Regional assessments of availability of attractive interconnection alternatives .............. 61 5.6. Regional Transmission Planning to Facilitate Generator interconnection .............. 64 5.6.1. Regional assessments of regional transmission planning to facilitate generator interconnection .............. 64 6 Appendix: Interconnection Customer Assessments of Interconnection Timeline and Costs .............. 69
※ 본 정보는 게시일로부터 수정/변경될 수 있으므로, 정확한 내용은 아래 출처의 링크를 통해 확인하시기 바랍니다.
|
|||
| 원문 링크 | https://blog.advancedenergyunited.org/reports/generator-interconnection-customer-survey-and-performance-scorecard | ||