KETEP 세계에너지시장정보

Contents 1 

About Ember 1 

Acknowledgement of Country 1 

Broader Context 2 

Specific Review Questions 4
 1. The impact of regulatory and other changes since 2015 that may influence the additionality of new projects under the method 4
 2. Whether method provisions for measuring and verifying abatement estimates are fit for purpose. Are there material reductions or increases in emissions that should be accounted for in the method? 7
 3. Whether changes to the method should be made with respect to eligible carbon abatement that can be counted in Australia’s National Greenhouse Accounts 8
 5. Whether the method sufficiently accounts for material greenhouse gas emissions directly resulting from carrying out the project 9
 6. Whether the inputs and variables used in the method’s abatement equations for both the conversion of methane and displacement of electricity remain conservative 9
 7. Should the crediting period be longer than 12 years for CMWG activities? 9
 8. Would including open-cut mines as eligible sites result in overall abatement on a year-by-year basis? 10
 9. What modelling and measurements would have to be done to calculate expected emissions in the normal course of events vs. abatement from a project on a year-by-year basis? 10
 10 & 11. What would be the expected uptake of projects and abatement if open-cut mines were eligible sites? 10
 12. What could the uptake of ventilated air methane only projects look like over the next 10 years? 11
 13. What portion of a mine’s fugitive emissions typically come from ventilated air methane, and would this portion increase or decrease in the next 10 years? 12
 14. Suggestions to improve the CMWG method 12