에너지정책동향보고서

정책동향보고서

제목	글로벌) 트랜스우라늄 관리를 위한 국제 협력 활용: 비교 연구
국가	[글로벌]	출처	NEA
산업구분	[원자력발전]	등록일	2026.06.22
본 보고서는 원자력기구(NEA) 전문가 그룹이 다양한 원자로 기술과 국제 협력을 통해 트랜스우라늄(TRU) 관리 전략을 비교·분석한 보고서이다. 원문 제목 및 목차 제목 : Harnessing International Co-operation for the Management of Transuranics: A Comparative Study 원문목차 : List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................. 13 Executive summary .............................................................................................................................. 15 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 17 2. Phase 1: Evaluation of different scenarios for TRU management ............................................ 19 2.1. Core concepts used in Phase 1 and the overall description of scenarios ........................... 19 2.2. Phase 1 Scenario evaluation ..................................................................................................... 20 2.3. Summary and conclusions of Phase 1 ..................................................................................... 50 3. Phase 2: Analysis of the “most promising” scenarios ............................................................... 55 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 55 3.2. Common reference framework ................................................................................................ 56 3.3. Presentation of the specificities of the eight chosen scenarios ........................................... 58 3.4. Results .......................................................................................................................................... 65 3.5. Summary and conclusions of Phase 2 ..................................................................................... 87 References .......................................................................................................................................... 88 4. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 89 Appendix A. Reactor types considered in the study ...................................................................... 91 A.1. PWR UOX .................................................................................................................................... 91 A.2. PWR MOX UE IMR ...................................................................................................................... 92 A.3. Sodium fast reactors ................................................................................................................. 93 A.4. GFR2400 ....................................................................................................................................... 96 A.5. SFR burner concept.................................................................................................................... 98 A.6. ADS .............................................................................................................................................. 99 References ........................................................................................................................................ 100 Appendix B. Description of the common framework used in Phase 1 ..................................... 101 B.1. Reactors ..................................................................................................................................... 102 B.2. Plants ......................................................................................................................................... 103 B.3. Data compilation for the study .............................................................................................. 103 B.4. Expected outputs ...................................................................................................................... 104 Appendix C. Simulated scenarios in Phase 2 ................................................................................ 107 C.1. Operational parameters .......................................................................................................... 107 C.2. Flows of nuclear material ....................................................................................................... 109 Appendix D. Detailed results in Phase 2 ........................................................................................ 113 D.1. All results .................................................................................................................................. 113 D.2. Results within groups ............................................................................................................. 122 D.3. Effect of Country B ................................................................................................................... 147 ※ 본 정보는 게시일로부터 수정/변경될 수 있으므로, 정확한 내용은 아래 출처의 링크를 통해 확인하시기 바랍니다.
원문 링크	https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_119075/harnessing-international-co-operation-for-the-management-of-transuranics-a-comparative-study * 이 링크를 클릭하면 외부 사이트로 연결됩니다. 해당 사이트 연결로 발생될 수 있는 보안 문제(악성코드, 해킹 등)는 본 사이트에서 책임지지 않으므로, 안전한 환경에서 접속해 주세요.

다음글 ▲: 스페인) 재생에너지는 높은 가스 가격으로부터 스페인 소비자를 보호한다

이전글 ▼: 글로벌) 전 세계 전력 생산에서 가스가 차지하는 비중이 5년 연속 감소